Hello

Click on the Start! button to create your own site.
You can add modules, change your network's style or invite members

[Your Club Name]

NB This is the FREE SquashNet website with adverts.
The ads can be removed when you upgrade your site to Premium for just £99 per year

Let, No Let or Stroke?

Consideration		Decision	Rule
Did interference occur?	NO	NO LET	12.7.1
YES
Was the interference minimal?	YES	NO LET	12.7.1
NO
Could the obstructed player have got to the ball and made a good return and was that player making every effort to do so?	NO	NO LET	12.7.2
YES
Did the obstructed player move past the point of interference and play on?	YES	NO LET	12.7.3
NO
Did the obstructed player create the interference in moving to the ball?	YES	NO LET	12.7.4
NO
Did the opponent make every effort to avoid interference?	NO	STROKE to player	12.8.1
YES
Did the interference prevent the player’s reasonable swing?	YES	STROKE to player	12.8.2
NO
Could the obstructed player have made a winning return?	YES	STROKE to player	12.8.3
NO
Would the obstructed player have struck the opponent with the ball going directly to the front wall or if going to a side wall would it have been a winning return?	YES	STROKE to player	12.8.4
	NO	YES LET	12.9

	Racketball Rules	180kb
	Racketball Rules Summary	149kb
	Racketball Scoring Announcement	164kb
	Squash Doubles Rules	376kb
	Squash Singles Rules	439kb

Loading …