Hello

Start

Click on the Start! button to create your own site.
Add modules, change the style and invite members.

 
 
 
[Your Club Name]
 
NB This is the FREE SquashNet website with adverts.
The ads can be removed when you upgrade your site to Premium for just £99 (inc VAT) per year

 

Let, No Let or Stroke?

Consideration
 
Decision Rule
Did interference occur? NO arrow_right NO LET 12.7.1

YES
arrow_down

 

 
Was the interference minimal? YES arrow_right
NO LET 12.7.1
NO
arrow_down
 

 
Could the obstructed player have got to the ball and made a good return and was that player making every effort to do so? NO
arrow_right NO LET 12.7.2
YES
arrow_down
 

 
Did the obstructed player move past the point of interference and play on? YES
arrow_right
NO LET 12.7.3
NO
arrow_down
 

 
Did the obstructed player create the interference in moving to the ball? YES arrow_right
NO LET 12.7.4
NO
arrow_down
 

 
Did the opponent make every effort to avoid interference? NO arrow_right STROKE to player 12.8.1
YES
arrow_down
   
 
Did the interference prevent the player’s reasonable swing? YES
arrow_right
STROKE to player 12.8.2
NO
arrow_down
   
 
Could the obstructed player have made a winning return? YES
arrow_right
STROKE to player 12.8.3
NO
arrow_down
   
 
Would the obstructed player have struck the opponent with the ball going directly to the front wall or if going to a side wall would it have been a winning return? YES arrow_right
STROKE to player 12.8.4

NO arrow_right YES LET 12.9

 
 

Useful info

DoublesRules 327kb
SinglesRules 538kb
 
Loading …
  • Server: web1.webjam.com
  • Total queries:
  • Serialization time: 250ms
  • Execution time: 328ms
  • XSLT time: $$$XSLT$$$ms